......................... |
. | ......![]() |
| Newspaper articles and press releases NEW
!!! Wal-Mart doesn't comply with rules
and regulations!
Do you really think they will provide everything they promise? Read on. Wednesday, May 12, 2004 Associated Press Wal-Mart Fined For Clean Water Act Violations WASHINGTON — Wal-Mart Stores Inc. the nation's largest retailer, will pay a $3.1 million fine to settle a Clean Water Act violation stemming from excessive storm water runoff from its construction sites, federal officials said Wednesday. Wal-Mart also agreed in the settlement with the Environmental Protection Agency and Justice Department to improve runoff controls at the more than 200 sites each year where the company builds stores, including Sam's Club outlets. "Storm water requirements have been in place for a long time," said Thomas Sansonetti, assistant attorney general for environment and national resources. "Developers like Wal-Mart must share responsibility with their construction contractors to ensure compliance." Officials at Wal-Mart, based in Bentonville, Ark., did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment. Storm water runoff carries sediment and dirt into the nation's waterways, killing fish, destroying habitat and blocking light that spurs growth of beneficial plant life. The runoff also can contain pesticides, chemicals, solvents and other toxic substances. The settlement, filed in U.S. District Court in Wilmington, Del., cites Wal-Mart violations at 24 construction sites in nine states and alleges the company failed to get required permits, did not institute a runoff control plan and failed to install controls to prevent discharges. Wal-Mart will comply with these requirements under the agreement and will improve training and inspections of its construction sites. The settlement also requires frequent reporting to the EPA. In addition, Wal-Mart agreed to spend $250,000 to help protect sensitive wetlands or waterways in one state, not yet determined, among the nine involved in the settlement. The nine states are California, Colorado, Delaware, Michigan, New Jersey, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Utah. In 2001, Wal-Mart and several contractors reached a similar storm water settlement that included payment of a $1 million penalty. EPA inspections of other sites arising from that case led to the latest violations. Wal-Mart reported sales in the fiscal year ended Jan. 31 of more than $256 billion, according to the company's Internet site. In the United States, Wal-Mart operates 2,981 stores and supercenters, 538 Sam's Club outlets and 67 Neighborhood Markets. More... Wal-Mart benefits from deaths of hourly employeesWAL-MART INSURANCE SETTLEMENT TOTALS $10.4 MILLION By L.M. SIXEL Copyright 2004 Houston Chronicle Wal-Mart agreed to pay $10.4 million to the families of 380 employees who died while they were covered by so-called "dead peasant" life insurance, according to the settlement documents filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in New Orleans. Wal-Mart insured the lives of about 350,000 employees in Texas between 1994 and 2000 without telling them. The families of the deceased workers sued to recover the millions of dollars collected by Wal-Mart after they they learned about the policies in 2001. During the time it owned the policies, Wal-Mart received $30.7 million in insurance proceeds from the deaths of the 380 employees, according to the settlement agreement. Wal-Mart received between $65,000 and $80,000 when each of its hourly wage workers died and hundreds of thousands of dollars when each of its management employees died. The settlement must be approved by U.S. District Judge Nancy Atlas in Houston. The amount of money each family receives will be determined by the number of families that come forward. During much of the time Wal-Mart owned the policies, Texas law did not permit employers to buy corporate owned life insurance on its nonexecutive employees. The law allowed such polices only on key executives. That prohibition ended in 1999 when Texas legislators voted to allow employers to profit from the deaths of their low-level employees as long as the employees consented in writing. The 5th Circuit ruled against Wal-Mart just hours after the retailer and the families reached their settlement. A Wal-Mart spokesman and lawyers for the families would not comment. When the agreement was reached last week, Wal-Mart refused to release the financial details.
New York Times, January 18, 2004 Workers Assail Night Lock-Ins by Wal-Mart By STEVEN GREENHOUSE Looking back to that night, Michael Rodriguez still has trouble believing the situation he faced when he was stocking shelves on the overnight shift at the Sam's Club in Corpus Christi, Tex. It was 3 a.m., Mr. Rodriguez recalled, some heavy machinery had just smashed into his ankle, and he had no idea how he would get to the hospital. The Sam's Club, a
Wal-Mart subsidiary, had locked its overnight workers in, as it
always did, to keep robbers out and, as some managers say, to prevent
employee theft. As usual, there was no manager with a key to let Mr.
Rodriguez out. The fire "My ankle was crushed," Mr. Rodriguez said, explaining he had been struck by an electronic cart driven by an employee moving stacks of merchandise. "I was yelling and running around like a hurt dog that had been hit by a car. Another worker made some phone calls to reach a manager, and it took an hour for someone to get there and unlock the door." The reason for Mr. Rodriguez's delayed trip to the hospital was a little-known Wal-Mart policy: the lock-in. For more than 15 years, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world's largest retailer, has locked in overnight employees at some of its Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores. It is a policy that many employees say has created disconcerting situations, such as when a worker in Indiana suffered a heart attack, when hurricanes hit in Florida and when workers' wives have gone into labor. "You could be bleeding to death, and they'll have you locked in," Mr. Rodriguez said. "Being locked in in an emergency like that, that's not right." Mona Williams, Wal-Mart's vice president for communications, said the company used lock-ins to protect stores and employees in high-crime areas. She said Wal-Mart locked in workers — the company calls them associates — at 10 percent of its stores, a percentage that has declined as Wal-Mart has opened more 24-hour stores. Ms. Williams said Wal-Mart, with 1.2 million employees in its 3,500 stores nationwide, had recently altered its policy to ensure that every overnight shift at every store has a night manager with a key to let workers out in emergencies. "Wal-Mart secures these
stores just as any other business does that has employees working
overnight," Ms. Williams said. "Doors are locked to protect associates
and the store from intruders. Fire doors are always accessible for
safety, and there will Ms. Williams said individual store managers, rather than headquarters, decided whether to lock workers in, depending on the crime rate in their area. Retailing experts and Wal-Mart's competitors said the company's lock-in policy was highly unusual. Officials at Kmart, Sears, Toys "R" Us, Home Depot and Costco, said they did not lock in workers. Even some retail industry experts questioned the policy. "It's clearly cause for concern," said Burt Flickinger, who runs a retail consulting concern. "Locking in workers, that's more of a 19th-century practice than a 20th-century one." Several Wal-Mart
employees said that as recently as a few months ago they had been
locked in on some nights without a manager who had a key. Robert
Schuster said that until last October, when he left his job at a Sam's
Club in Colorado "They told us it's a big fine for the company if we go out the fire door and there's no fire," Mr. Schuster said. "They gave us a big lecture that if we go out that door, you better make sure it's an emergency like the place going up on fire." Augustine Herrera, who worked at the Colorado Springs store for nine years, disputed the company's assertion that it locked workers in stores in only high-crime areas, largely to protect employees. "The store is in a perfectly safe area," Mr. Herrera said. Several employees said
Wal-Mart began making sure that there was someone with a key seven
nights a week at the Colorado Springs store and other stores starting
Jan. 1, shortly after The New York Times began making inquiries about
employees' The main reason that Wal-Mart and Sam's stores lock in workers, several former store managers said, was not to protect employees but to stop "shrinkage" — theft by employees and outsiders. Tom Lewis, who managed four Sam's Clubs in Texas and Tennessee, said: "It's to prevent shrinkage. Wal-Mart is like any other company. They're concerned about the bottom line, and the bottom line is affected by shrinkage in the store." Another reason for lock-ins, he said, was to increase efficiency — workers could not sneak outside to smoke a cigarette, get high or make a quick trip home. Mr. Rodriguez acknowledged that the seemingly obvious thing to have done after breaking his ankle was to leave by the fire door, but he and two dozen other Wal-Mart and Sam's Club workers said they had repeatedly been warned never to do that unless there was a fire. Leaving for any other reason, they said, could jeopardize the jobs of the offending employee and the night supervisor. Regarding Mr. Rodriguez, Ms. Williams said, "He was clearly capable of walking out a fire door anytime during the night." She added: "We tell associates that common sense has to prevail. Fire doors are for emergencies, and by all means use them if you have emergencies. We have no way of knowing what any individual manager said to an associate." None of the Wal-Mart workers interviewed said they knew anyone who had been fired for violating the fire-exit policy in an emergency, but several said they knew workers who had received official reprimands, the first step toward firing. Several said managers had told them of firing workers for such an offense. "They let us know they'd fire people for going out the fire door, unless there was a fire." said Farris Cobb, who was a night supervisor at several Sam's Clubs in Florida. "They instilled in us they had done it before and they would do it again." Mr. Cobb and several other workers interviewed about lock-ins were plaintiffs in lawsuits accusing Wal-Mart of forcing them to work off the clock, for example working several hours without pay after their shifts ended. Wal-Mart says it tells managers never to let employees work off the clock. Janet Anderson, who was a
night supervisor at a Sam's Club in Colorado from 1996 to 2002, said
that many of her employees were also airmen stationed at a nearby Air
Force base. Their commanders sometimes called the store to order them
to report to duty immediately, but she said they often had to wait
until a manager arrived Ms. Anderson also told of a worker who had broken his foot one night while using a cardboard box baler and had to wait four hours for someone to open the door. She said the store's managers had lied to her and the overnight crew, telling them the fire doors could not be physically opened by the workers and that the doors would open automatically when the fire alarm was triggered. Only after several years as night supervisor did she learn that she could open the fire door from inside, she said, but she was told she faced dismissal if she opened it when there was no fire. One night, she said, she cut her finger badly with a box cutter but dared not go out the fire exit — waiting until morning to get 13 stitches at a hospital. The federal government
and almost all states do not bar locking in workers so long as they
have access to an emergency exit. But several longtime Wal-Mart workers
recalled that in the late 1980's and early 1990's, the fire doors of
some Wal-Marts Wal-Mart officials said they cracked down on that practice after an overnight stocker at a store in Savannah, Ga., collapsed and died in 1988. Paramedics could not get into the store soon enough because the employees inside could not open the fire door or front door, and there was no manager with a key. "We certainly do not do that now," Ms. Williams said. "It's not been that way for a long time." Explaining the policy, she said, "Only about 10 percent of our stores do not allow associates to come and go at will, and these are generally in higher crime areas where the associates' safety is considered an issue." Mr. Lewis, the former store manager, said he had been willing to get out of bed at any hour to drive back to his store to unlock the door in an emergency. But he said many Sam's Club managers were not as responsive. "Sometimes you couldn't get hold of a manager," he said. "The tendency of managers was to sleep through the nights. They let the answering machine pick up." Mr. Cobb, the overnight supervisor in Florida, said he remembered once when a stocker was deathly sick, throwing up repeatedly. He said he called the store manager at home and told him, " `You need to come let this person out.' He said: `Find one of the mattresses. Have him lay down on the floor.' "I went into certain situations like that, and I called store managers, and they pretty much told me that they wouldn't come in to unlock the door. So I would call another manager, and a lot of times they would tell you that they were on their way, when they weren't." Mr. Cobb said the
Wal-Mart rule that generally prohibits employees from working more than
40 hours a week to avoid paying overtime played out in strange ways for
night-shift employees. Mr. Cobb said that on many workers' fifth work
day of the Roy Ellsworth Jr., who was a cashier at a Wal-Mart in Pueblo, Colo., said he was normally scheduled to work until the store closed at 10 p.m., but most nights management locked the front door, at closing time, and did not let workers leave until everyone had straightened up the store. "They would keep us there for however long they wanted," Mr. Ellsworth said. "It was often for half an hour, and it could be two hours or longer during Christmas season." One night, shortly after
closing time, Mr. Ellsworth had an asthma attack. "My inhaler hardly
helped," he said. "I couldn't breathe. I felt I was going to pass out.
I got fuzzy vision. I told the assistant manager I really needed to go
to the hospital. He One top Wal-Mart official said: "If those things happened five or six years ago, we're a very large company with more that 3,000 stores, and individual instances like that could happen. That's certainly not something Wal-Mart would condone."
PROCEED WITH CAUTION
ON PLANS FOR NEW STORE Town of Salina planners need to ensure that the proposed Mal-Mart SuperCenter does not worsen the rush-hour bottlenecks in and around the village of Liverpool. The village is just one of a few points where residents in the northeast suburbs must pass through to connect with Syracuse and destinations south. Traffic can already be bumper to bumper, especially when Onondaga Lake Parkway is closed for hazardous weather or special events. Wal-Mart wants to build the 204,000-square foot store on about 35 acres at Route 57 and the Liverpool Bypass. The store would be open 24 hours a day. It would make parking available for 1,037 vehicles. Plans call for the main road entrance--- a 60-foot-wide, five-lane driveway--to be on Route 57. Two additional entrances would be on the bypass. The company said it would pay for road improvements that will ease the flow of traffic. Town planners shouldn't put up road blocks to the development. The new store would employ 475 people. But planners must proceed with caution.
Press Release Wednesday, December 17, 2003 WAL-MART MAILING: RETURN TO
SENDER LIVERPOOL, NY- The community group LiverpoolFIRST is taking issue with a recent mailing sent to Salina area residents from the Connecticut based Wal-Mart East Region Community Relations office supporting a Wal-Mart Supercenter on Route 57, just outside the village of Liverpool. "This is a fluff-piece designed to soft sell the idea of plunking down a huge high-traffic development in a residential area," said Sharon Fulmer, LiverpoolFIRST spokesperson. "It is misleading and area residents should not be fooled." "Promises of jobs, tax revenues and charitable community contributions are standard practice for Wal-Mart," said Fulmer. "But they fail to mention forcing local businesses to close, increased traffic, increased crime, and loading docks in use around the clock less than 250 feet from residential yards." "LiverpoolFIRST was particularly appalled at the promise of donations of "tens of thousands of dollars a year to local charities and causes..." stated Fulmer. "This smacks of a bribe for support. Liverpool is not for sale." LiverpoolFIRST is a community group comprised of residents and business owners from the towns of Salina and Clay that are concerned with the proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter on Route 57. The group aims to inform the public of the hazards and quality of life issues that this Wal-Mart would bring to the Village of Liverpool and surrounding neighborhoods. Interested residents and businesses can obtain additional information by visiting LiverpoolFIRST on the Web at http://www.liverpoolfirst.com/ or by email at LiverpoolFirst@LiverpoolFirst.com.
|
| Home | About | Calendar | Links | Become involved |
Last updated 05/13/04